Framework Disclaimer & Responsible Use
Cormorant Foraging Framework
Version 1.0 | Effective Date: January 2025
Semantic Intent | semanticintent.dev
Purpose of This Disclaimer
This document outlines the limitations, risks, and responsible use guidelines for the Cormorant Foraging framework. By using, implementing, or deploying systems based on this framework, you acknowledge understanding these constraints.
This framework is a tool, not a guarantee. Like any analytical methodology, it requires domain expertise, validation, and continuous oversight.
1. No Warranties or Guarantees
1.1 Framework Limitations
The Cormorant Foraging framework:
✅IS: A dimensional taxonomy and design methodology for intelligence systems
✅IS: A collection of observable property patterns and mathematical approaches
✅IS: Open-source guidance for building transparent, interpretable systems
The framework:
❌IS NOT: A certified, regulated, or guaranteed methodology
❌IS NOT: A replacement for domain expertise or professional judgment
❌IS NOT: Validated for life-critical applications without extensive additional testing
No warranty, express or implied:
The framework is provided "as is" without any warranty of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, or non-infringement.
1.2 Mathematical Formulas
The formulas presented (exponential decay, additive scoring, multiplicative ICE):
- Are derived from physical principles and established practices
- Require domain-specific calibration for each use case
- May not be appropriate for all applications
Example formulas are illustrative, not prescriptive. Parameters (half-lives, weights, thresholds) must be validated by subject matter experts in your specific domain.
2. Dimensional Misapplication Risks
2.1 Known Anti-Patterns
⚠️ Critical Warning: Life-Safety Applications
DO NOT apply Time Dimension (temporal decay) to:
- Emergency medical triage
- Life-threatening condition monitoring
- Safety-critical alert systems
Reason: Temporal decay formulas can cause urgency to diminish over time, leading to delayed response in life-threatening situations.
DO NOT apply Sound Dimension (urgency scoring) to:
- Long-term strategic planning
- Portfolio architecture design
- Structural analysis requiring stability
Reason: Urgency-based scoring can cause thrashing, overreaction, and premature optimization in contexts requiring deliberate analysis.
DO NOT apply Space Dimension (multiplicative ICE) to:
- Real-time fraud detection
- Emergency response systems
- Time-critical safety alerts
Reason: Multiplicative collapse (if any dimension is low, priority collapses) can suppress urgent warnings when execution difficulty is high.
2.2 Your Responsibility
You are responsible for:
- Validating dimensional fit for your specific domain
- Calibrating parameters with domain experts
- Testing boundary conditions and failure modes
- Implementing human oversight for high-consequence decisions
- Continuously monitoring prediction accuracy
We cannot predict all misapplications. Use professional judgment.
3. Observable Property Anchoring Limitations
3.1 What "Observable" Means
The framework emphasizes grounding intelligence in observable properties—measurable, verifiable data points.
However:
- Observables can be noisy: Sensor drift, calibration errors, environmental factors
- Observables can be incomplete: Missing context, hidden variables, unmeasured factors
- Observables can mislead: Correlation ≠ causation, confounding variables
Observable anchoring is necessary but not sufficient for reliable systems.
3.2 Measurement Uncertainty
All measurements have uncertainty. Your systems must:
- Quantify measurement accuracy (±X%)
- Propagate uncertainty through calculations
- Present confidence intervals, not false precision
- Flag when data quality is insufficient
Never claim certainty when uncertainty exists.
4. Domain-Specific Validation Required
4.1 Regulated Industries
If deploying in regulated domains (healthcare, finance, aviation, pharmaceuticals):
You must:
- Obtain domain expert validation before deployment
- Comply with all applicable regulations (FDA, FAA, SEC, GDPR, EU AI Act, etc.)
- Conduct appropriate clinical trials, safety testing, or regulatory review
- Implement required audit trails and explainability mechanisms
- Maintain liability insurance as appropriate
The framework does not constitute regulatory approval.
4.2 High-Stakes Applications
For applications involving:
- Human safety
- Financial consequences > $100K
- Legal liability
- Irreversible decisions
You must:
- Implement human-in-the-loop review for all critical decisions
- Maintain audit logs of all system recommendations and human overrides
- Test failure modes extensively (red team, adversarial testing)
- Have incident response procedures for system failures
- Obtain legal counsel regarding liability
7. Liability Limitations
7.1 No Liability for Misuse
To the maximum extent permitted by law:
Semantic Intent, Michael Shatny, and contributors to the Cormorant Foraging framework:
- Are not liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, or punitive damages
- Make no guarantees about the framework's suitability for any particular purpose
- Disclaim all responsibility for implementation errors, misapplications, or domain-specific failures
You assume all risk when deploying systems based on this framework.
7.2 Indemnification
By using this framework, you agree to indemnify and hold harmless:
- Semantic Intent
- Michael Shatny
- Framework contributors
- Associated organizations
...from any claims, damages, liabilities, or expenses arising from your use or misuse of the framework.
8. Responsible Use Guidelines
8.1 Pre-Deployment Checklist
Before deploying any Cormorant Foraging-based system:
Technical Validation:
- ☐ Dimensional fit validated by domain expert
- ☐ Formula parameters calibrated to domain
- ☐ Boundary conditions explicitly documented
- ☐ Failure modes identified and tested
- ☐ Observable properties verified for accuracy
- ☐ Confidence intervals quantified
Operational Safety:
- ☐ Human oversight mechanism implemented
- ☐ Audit logging in place
- ☐ Monitoring and drift detection active
- ☐ Incident response procedures documented
- ☐ Stakeholder training completed
Legal & Compliance:
- ☐ Regulatory requirements identified
- ☐ Legal counsel consulted (if high-stakes)
- ☐ Liability insurance obtained (if applicable)
- ☐ Privacy/data protection compliance verified
8.2 Continuous Monitoring
After deployment:
- Track prediction accuracy: Compare predictions to actual outcomes
- Detect model drift: Alert when error rates exceed thresholds
- Log human overrides: Understand when and why experts disagree with system
- Audit regularly: Review system behavior quarterly (minimum)
- Update parameters: Recalibrate as domain evolves
8.3 Transparency Obligations
When deploying systems that affect people:
- Disclose automation: Users should know when AI/algorithms are involved
- Explain decisions: Provide reasoning for system recommendations
- Enable appeal: Allow humans to challenge system outputs
- Document limitations: Be honest about what system cannot do
Transparency builds trust. Opacity erodes it.
13. Final Reminders
The Framework is a Tool, Not a Religion
Use the framework where it fits. Ignore it where it doesn't.
- Not every problem is a Sound/Space/Time problem
- Not every solution needs exponential decay
- Not every system requires dimensional taxonomy
Professional judgment trumps framework dogma.
Epistemic Humility
The framework could be wrong.
- Formulas are approximations, not universal laws
- Observables have measurement error
- Models fail during regime changes
- Humans have final say
Build systems that fail gracefully and admit uncertainty.
The Prime Directive
Above all else: Do no harm.
If you're unsure whether your application is safe:
- Consult domain experts
- Start with low-stakes deployments
- Monitor obsessively
- Maintain human oversight
- Be willing to shut it down
Your users' safety > your system's performance.
Acceptance
By using, implementing, or deploying systems based on the Cormorant Foraging framework, you acknowledge that you have read, understood, and agree to be bound by this disclaimer.
If you do not agree, do not use the framework.
Document Version: 1.0
Last Updated: January 2025
Maintained by: Semantic Intent
© 2025 Semantic Intent. Framework licensed under MIT License.
Disclaimer effective regardless of license terms.